He Said, She Said: Weight Loss for Athletics

Posted on by

He Said

“You’re an RD, right?” That’s what one of my patients asked me last year shortly before he got up from the table and walked out of my office, never to return. It was more of a rhetorical question, really, his polite way of telling me I don’t know how to do my job.

He and I were only in each other’s lives briefly, as that was not only his last visit, it was also his first. His new patient paperwork stated that he wanted to lose weight in order to complete a marathon. Upon reading that, I contacted him in advance of his visit and offered a heads-up that I would help him to run his best, and as a consequence of doing so, he might also lose weight; but I would not be helping him to lose weight in hopes that it would improve his running because – contrary to popular belief – that is not how things actually work.

Although I suspected he would respond by cancelling the appointment, to his credit he had an open enough mind to meet with me and discuss our different points of view. Elite marathon runners are all very skinny, he told me, so it only seemed logical to him that if he could alter his body to look more like theirs, then he would in turn become a better runner.

Way back in my sophomore year of high school, I held the same belief. When I looked at those teammates on my track team who were faster than me, I noticed that for the most part they were leaner than me. Consequently, I attempted to change my body by restricting my fat intake (Back in those days, people were scared of fats the same way people nowadays fear “carbs.”) in hopes that I would also run better.

In fact, I ran worse. My mom took me to a dietitian who educated me, dispelled some of the nutrition myths that I held, and convinced me to increase my fat intake. My times in all events dropped, and I was the fastest I had ever been in my young running career without my physique ever changing all that much.

Having a leaner, smaller, or lighter body can certainly have athletic upsides sometimes, just as having a heavier or larger body can sometimes be advantageous, and I am not arguing otherwise. However, a significant difference exists between an athlete who naturally has a given size or shape versus someone who tries to force his or her body into that mold. That is where so many people, like my 15-year-old self and the patient I mentioned earlier, get tripped up.

Anecdotally, we see many examples of athletes who perform worse after intentionally losing weight. Last month, I wrote about how CC Sabathia has struggled since cutting his carbohydrates in an effort to lose weight. He and his slender frame are in the midst of experiencing the two worst seasons of his career, both of which have come since he lost weight.

Sabathia gave an interview earlier this year in which he talked about the fatigue he now experiences. Carbohydrates are our main source of energy. Now that he follows a low-carbohydrate diet, no wonder he currently tires early in games now. Only twice in my life have I failed to complete bicycle routes that I set out to ride. The first was when I fell off my bike in Montana and fractured my back. The other was when I was briefly experimenting with a low-carbohydrate diet and did not have the fuel necessary to make it home.

This summer, I had a couple of rowers come to me hoping to lose weight so they could compete in lightweight crew. Each of them believed that if he could shed enough weight to just make the 160-pound cutoff, he would dominate. However, they were not taking into account that the processes necessary to alter their bodies (over-exercise and/or dietary restriction) were likely to leave them unable to put forth optimal performances. A well-nourished and properly-trained 159-pound athlete is probably going to row much better than his or her 159-pound teammate who maintains that weight by existing in a state of depletion.

At the same time, let us acknowledge that not every athlete is already at the weight at which they can perform his or her best. Some athletes, just like the rest of the population, are subject to behaviors, such as emotional overeating, that might be impacting weight. However, putting the horse before the cart means directly addressing issues that might be hindering performance while allowing weight change to naturally occur or not occur as a consequence. To try losing weight in hopes of becoming a better athlete though is to have the process backwards.


She Said

Some of the individuals who come to see me for nutrition counseling are student athletes who are struggling with an eating disorder (ED). These cases are particularly challenging, as one of the cruxes of being an athlete (at least at a competitive high school or college level) is making sure one is in top physical condition to succeed in one’s sport. While this desire to be in the best athletic condition might be approached in a healthy and manageable way by some individuals, for those who are predisposed to EDs, it can sometimes start, trigger, and/or worsen the individual’s ED.

In the sports where weight control is believed to be paramount to success (e.g., gymnastics, ballet, track and field, etc.), this focus and, in some cases, obsession with being “lean,” “fit,” or “cut,” can result in the athlete eating in a restrictive manner (e.g., cutting out carbohydrates, only eating vegetables and protein) and exercising excessively. Initially, these individuals seem to be doing the right thing, taking care of themselves and making the sacrifices needed to become the best at their sport. The problem arises when the obsession with weight, food, and exercise takes over the athlete’s life. Examples of this include avoiding social situations that involve eating in order to train harder at the gym, exercising even while injured or sick, and panicking when being faced with foods that are not on the “clean eating” food list.

While these scenarios are red flags in and of themselves, the physical ramifications of these behaviors are serious as well. One of the most common outcomes that results from overtraining and undereating in female athletes is the Female Athlete Triad. This syndrome is characterized by three conditions: energy deficiency with or without a diagnosed ED, menstrual disturbances or absence of period completely (amenorrhea), and loss of bone density resulting in osteopenia or osteoporosis. In a nutshell, when an athlete is not eating enough to fuel her training, this can lead to dangerous health problems.

Some health professionals believe that individuals who are dealing with the above problems can continue to participate in their sports as long as they are getting nutrition education from a registered dietitian and having regular check-ups with their primary care physician to make sure they are medically stable enough to compete. While I agree that for some individuals it is just a matter of education and monitoring, for those with EDs, allowing them to continue with their sport could greatly hinder the recovery process. An ED is a multifaceted problem that needs a full treatment team including a therapist, dietitian, and doctor who is knowledgeable about EDs. The focus should be on helping the athlete become physically healthy while dealing with the underlying psychological issues that are part of the ED.

When I am working with a student athlete who is exhibiting disordered eating and/or excessive exercise, I always defer to the physician on the treatment team to make the call about whether the patient is medically safe enough to participate in his or her sport. The work I do with the patient centers on helping them understand what their body’s needs are fuel-wise. This might include educating the patient about carbohydrates and why they are a necessary macronutrient (for athletes and non-athletes) and how to eat to improve one’s athletic performance.

If you or someone you know seems to be struggling with an ED related to being an athlete, it’s important to take action. Talk to your doctor as soon as possible to prevent the situation from becoming worse. Find a therapist and a dietitian who are adept at working with athletes who struggle with EDs. It is also important to alert the sports team’s trainer and coach to the problem, as they will be an integral part of the treatment team. When all of these pieces of the treatment team are in place, the likelihood of recovery is much higher.

“Weight that will stay off”

Posted on by

TextThe above text exchange appeared in my Facebook feed, placed there by a personal trainer (whose name I blacked out from the image) who shared it to promote his business, a testimony to his prowess and the results he can bring to his clients who are seeking to lose weight.

Let’s talk about results. Losing weight is relatively easy and numerous paths to weight loss exist. Keeping off the lost weight, well, that is a completely different story. Research shows us that about 95% of people who try to lose weight will ultimately regain it (whether or not they maintain the behaviors that created the weight loss in the first place) and of that 95%, 60% of them will end up heavier than they were at baseline.

Said differently, if 100 people intentionally lose weight, five of them will keep it off, 38 of them will return to baseline, and 57 of them will end up heavier than when they started.

These facts may not be talked about very much in our weight-loss-obsessed society, but they are no secret. At the 2013 Cardiometabolic Health Congress, data were presented showing that this pattern of weight loss and subsequent regain was virtually identical regardless of the mode somebody used to lose it. That is why some people in the healthcare field say that the best way to gain weight is to go on a diet.

So when the trainer refers to his client’s 10 pounds of lost weight as “Weight that will stay off,” on what is he basing that claim? Based on the research, if he says something like that to 20 of his clients, 19 times he will be wrong. Not only is he misleading people with false promises and expectations, but he is putting them at high risk for weight cycling and the negative consequences with which it is associated.

Chances are better than not that the client in question will eventually regain the 10 pounds he or she lost plus more. What will the text exchange between the trainer and client look like then?

The sad thing is that I think the trainer in question is actually a good trainer in terms of the mechanics of his profession. He just needs to be more careful about the lessons he is teaching his clients. Had he responded to his client’s text with a sentiment along the lines of, “Losing weight feels important to you right now, but let’s remember that being physically active is doing wonders for your health and well-being regardless of what happens with your weight,” I would not be writing this blog.

Weight Loss Specialist

Posted on by

“Luck is the last dying wish of those who want to believe that winning can happen by accident. Sweat is for those who know it’s a choice.”

Suggesting that achieving our goals is up to us if only we work hard enough sounds motivating on the surface, but really it makes no sense. So, what, the 99.2% of players in the U.S. Open main draws who walked away without a title did not realize all they had to do was work hard and choose to win? Outcomes that rely on factors beyond our control breaking our way are not automatically there for the taking if only we put our mind to it.

Where that quote originally comes from is not clear to me, but I know I first heard it from a personal trainer who cites it as one of his favorite quotes. According to said trainer’s Facebook page, he now employs a certified “Weight Loss Specialist.” Awesome.

Here is the problem: If a supposed specialist is giving you the information you supposedly need to lose weight, and achieving your goal is framed as a choice that is entirely in your control and can be attained through hard work, and you do not achieve your weight-loss goal, then who is to blame?


If we mislead people into believing that weight loss is entirely up to them and they do not achieve (or more likely maintain) it, they typically turn their frustration and disappointment on themselves with berating thoughts like, “I have no willpower,” “I need to be more disciplined,” “I’m such a loser,” and “I just need to work harder next time.”

Behaviors that in and of themselves were beneficial to health independent of weight loss, such as being physically active or eating fruits and vegetables, are abandoned because they did not lead to weight loss. Restriction gets taken up a notch. They pursue an even more rigid diet and/or intense exercise regimen, not realizing that these behaviors themselves can make weight increase and/or lead to health issues. A colleague of mine calls it “paradigm blindness.” In other words, many people do not realize that their presumed solution to being “overweight” actually exacerbates the condition, so they keep adding more of the supposed solution to the ever-worsening issue.

I used to help (and I use that verb loosely, as I was actually part of the problem even as I thought I was part of the solution) people with weight loss earlier in my career too, but that was before I knew better.

Well-constructed research, my clinical experience, and the experiences of many of my fellow dietitians teach us that weight loss is typically not in one’s control. Sure, our behaviors do matter, but other factors, such as genetics, environment, medical conditions, and personal history, are either partially or completely out of our hands.

The paradox is that any true “Weight Loss Specialist” would know that nobody by that title actually exists. Healthcare practitioners are supposed to help people with, you know, health, which is why Joanne and I take the focus off of weight and instead focus on behaviors that can actually make a difference.


Posted on by

A couple of people sent me the link to this article about identical twin brothers who performed a nutrition experiment on themselves.  One of them adopted a diet very low in fat while the other followed a diet extremely low in carbohydrates.

By the end, neither one of them felt well.  One brother concluded, “We should not vilify a single nutrient.  It is too easy to demonize fat or sugar, but that enables you to let yourself off the hook in other ways.  The enemy is right in front of us in the shape of processed foods.”

While I agree with the first part of what he said, his last sentence undermines his initial point.  Just as it makes no sense to scapegoat a particular nutrient that exists in the larger context of one’s eating pattern, it is similarly ridiculous to blame a particular form of food (in this case, processed food) that exists in the vast expanse that is one’s overall lifestyle.  To do so is to badly oversimplify what is a very complex picture.  Exclusion, oversimplification, and blame rarely lead to good nutrition.

The people I have seen who have been able to attain and maintain good health are the people who find balance: balance in their eating, and balance in their lifestyles.  Every food has its pros and cons and therefore no food is “the enemy.”  Even processed foods have their upsides: enjoyment, convenience, shelf life, price, etc.  Otherwise, nobody would ever eat them.

While eating processed foods all the time clearly has ramifications, so does never eating them.  Decreased enjoyment, social isolation, weight gain (yes, gain), preoccupation with food, and eating disorders can all result from this kind of restriction.  Misled by a culture of dieting and nutritional scapegoating, many well-intentioned individuals struggle with these issues.  Joanne and I regularly work with such patients at our practice, where we help them to find a healthier relationship with food and ultimately better health overall.

The time to leave exclusion and scapegoating behind is now.  Instead, understand that every food can have its place in a healthy lifestyle.  Pursue balance.  We are here to help.

The Real You Is Sexy

Posted on by

Aerie, the lingerie branch of American Eagle, is going with a “The Real You Is Sexy” campaign for their spring line.  My understanding is that the ads are not retouched in any way and show the models just as they were when the photographers took their pictures.  Aerie deserves credit for this move, but this change alone does not fix the underlying problem.  The greater problem is with us, not the fashion industry.

Reality is more complex than I am about to make it seem, but the basic premise is that we compare ourselves to models, feel pressure to look like them, feel bad about ourselves for not looking like them, and adopt certain behaviors – healthy or not – in an effort to match them.  Other advertisement campaigns that do retouch photos can dramatically alter a model’s appearance making him or her seem flawless.  When such a picture is held up as the ideal, we are comparing ourselves to someone who does not even exist.  As such, who can possibly live up to that standard?  Aerie deserves credit for at least removing this as a factor from the equation.

The larger problem though is that we compare our bodies to others in the first place, and that is not going to go away even if the fashion industry completely does away with retouching.  For example, I work with a patient who watches women leaner than herself pass by in town and feels bad about herself as a result.  No retouching there; she is comparing herself to people she sees with her own eyes.

We do not know what somebody does to look a certain way.  I do not know any of the Aerie models and I have no idea what they do to maintain their looks, but chances are neither do you.  They might look the way they do because they are genetically predisposed to have that figure and on top of it take excellent care of themselves.  On the other hand, they could also look that way due to eating disorders, overexercise, or other unhealthy behaviors.  One of my patients, a former model who is working to overcome anorexia, tells me of the pressure in the industry to gain a certain look at any costs, healthy or not.  If a model gets his or her frame through an eating disorder, are we really to look up to that image as an ideal just because there is no retouching involved?  In that sense, we still should not be using models – retouched or not – for a point of comparison.   

To further the point, we should not be comparing our bodies to anybody else either.  I discussed with my patient, the one who compared herself to other women in town, that we have no idea what those women do to maintain their looks.  Some of them are probably perfectly healthy, while others might struggle with eating disorders or other unhealthy behaviors.  Some of them are deeply unhappy and live rigid lives in isolation so they can do exactly what they need to do in order to maintain their physiques.  Some of them would laugh if they knew other people look up to them because no matter how great somebody else says they look, they still hate their bodies themselves.  I know all of this because I just described patients of mine.  These problems are much more prevalent than one might think.

It is time to stop comparing our bodies to others.  Weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and other anthropometric measurements do not define us and should not determine our self-worth.  Love and accept yourself the way you are now, not X pounds from now, and focus on leading a healthy lifestyle built on a foundation of balance.

How should one measure health?

Posted on by

“I really like your blog posts.  They’re really well thought out and are a step above what I imagine normal nutrition blogs are like.  It’s like the philosophy of nutrition or something.  Question, though, when you say this: ‘Joanne and I advocate focusing on health rather than weight.  In that sense, weight outcomes are only somewhat interesting to us.’  I think you’re right, but it also seems challenging to measure one’s health without focusing on weight.  There are very few things a person can do other than stepping on a scale (without regular blood draws and periodic EKGs [electrocardiograms]) to measure their health.  In other words, how do you recommend someone measure their health to see if their health is improving?”

The above email arrived in response to a blog I posted earlier this month in which I compared the slim hopes of winning the lottery to the poor success rate of weight-loss endeavors.  Indeed, Joanne and I do advocate adapting lifestyle changes in pursuit of better health as opposed to taking a weight-centered approach because the latter rarely turns out well.

Furthermore, weight in and of itself is generally not a good indicator of health (although there are some exceptions to this generality, such as for a patient who is recovering from anorexia nervosa).  About a decade ago, I had a weekly doubles game with three other guys.  One player was very lean and clearly had the lowest body mass index (BMI) of any of us.  Was he the healthiest in the group just because he was the lightest for his frame?  After we had been playing together for a few months, I got a call one afternoon saying he had had a heart attack.  I came to find out he was also diabetic.

So if not by weight then, by what should we measure our health?

First, we need to understand that just because a measuring tool is convenient and easy to use does not mean it is valid.  In other words, just because gaining access to a scale and stepping on it are actions that most people can perform does not mean that the resulting data are automatically useful.

You know from my biography that I have an undergraduate degree in mathematics.  For a statistics class project, I analyzed the November 6, 1997 trade between the Red Sox and Rangers that sent Aaron Sele, Mark Brandenburg, and Bill Haselman to Texas in exchange for Damon Buford and Jim Leyritz.  In an effort to determine which team got the better end of the deal, I analyzed the past performances of the trade’s cornerstones, Sele and Leyritz, and determined which metrics were the best predictors of the outcome that ultimately mattered most: team wins.  Some statistics, like strikeouts for a pitcher or home runs for a hitter, are easy to compute and understand, but it turned out that other metrics that were more complex to calculate and comprehend were better predictors of team wins.

While I was in the process of switching careers, I did a similar project in my nutrition assessment course in which I tried to determine which anthropometric measurement is the best predictor of cardiovascular disease.  The results were complex, but the conclusion that I reached is not the point of this blog entry.  The point is that just as I found with the baseball project, the ease of obtaining a particular measurement has nothing to do with the utility of said measurement.  In other words, just because it is easy to count the number of home runs a player accumulates or to step on a scale and find out our weight does not mean that these numbers are great indicators of team wins or our health, respectively.

With that in mind, let us now turn our attention to just some of the ways we can measure health.  This list is far from complete, but it gives a sense of all of the measurement tools healthcare practitioners have at their disposal.

We have anthropometric data, such as waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, body fat percentage, and BMI.  We have the numerous biochemical markers that doctors can examine through blood and urine tests, including blood glucose, insulin, total cholesterol , LDL (“bad cholesterol”), HDL (“good cholesterol”), triglycerides, red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC), and markers of liver health, protein stores, electrolytes, and inflammation.  Clinical indicators include hair and skin quality, finger nail appearance, and tests for hydration status.  Electrocardiograms and blood pressure readings comprise part of a cardiovascular system assessment.  Men and women can screen themselves for signs of testicular and breast cancer, respectively, through regular exams.

When I was a personal trainer, I used tests like the eight-repetition maximum bench press, Rockport walk, and sit-and-reach to assess my clients’ fitness and track their changes over time.  In my realm of nutrition, dietitians will sometimes use tools, such as a 24-hour recall or food frequency questionnaire, to assess the health of one’s food intake.  Aside from one’s intake of fruits and vegetables, for example, one can track other health-related behaviors themselves, such as physical activity duration and frequency as well as usage of tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs.

Health is not just about the physical; emotional and psychological health is also important.  This is not my area of expertise, but I am sure psychologists and psychiatrists have ways of screening for and assessing the magnitude of conditions ranging from depression to schizophrenia.

With all of these different tools we have for assessing and tracking health, the criteria that one uses has to be individualized, which is why it is important to talk with your healthcare team about how you should track your own health.  For example, diabetics may measure their health in part by monitoring their blood sugar at home and keeping their A1C under a benchmark value set by their doctors.  A patient with a family history of cardiovascular disease may monitor his health in part through periodic blood lipid level checks and self-monitoring of blood pressure at home.  A patient with celiac disease may monitor her health in part through bone density screenings and tTG blood tests.  A patient with a history of skin cancer may measure his health in part through routine screenings with the dermatologist.

The permutations of how to measure health are endless and must be customized with the help of your doctor and any other healthcare practitioners who are on your treatment team.  Just because weight is easy to measure does not mean one should put much stock in the number or even track it at all.

The Lottery

Posted on by

Ralph Francois, of Quincy, won $1,000,000 playing Mega Millions. Marjorie Teixeira, Frank DiMascio, and Christine Cummings, of Melrose, Watertown, and Dedham, respectively, all won lottery prizes on the same December day. Stanley Goryl of Smithfield, Francis McPherson of Somerville, Marque Scott of Fall River, Patricia Cannata of Attleboro, and Linh Dang of Dorchester are just a few of the 15 locals who won at least $1,000,000 through the lottery last month. Their pictures, smiling and holding up enlarged replicas of their winning tickets and prize checks, are both evidence of their victories as well as enticements to the rest of us suggesting that we can be winners too.

Despite these testimonials that fill us with hope, most people do not walk away a winner.  Massachusetts lottery players, on average, will only win back $0.72 for every $1.00 they spend on lottery tickets. According to a study by Bloomberg, state lotteries “have the worst odds of any form of legal gambling” in the country. To put things in perspective, one reportedly is 1,400 times more likely to die in an asteroid apocalypse than he or she is to win Powerball. As if the odds themselves were not concerning enough, playing the lottery can sometimes spiral out of control. A link on the Massachusetts State Lottery’s website directs people to where they can get help for compulsive gambling.

Some people enjoy gambling, including the lottery, and as one of my friends said to me recently, “You can’t win if you don’t play.” Going about it with a sporting attitude for the sake of entertainment and excitement is one thing, but nobody actually believes that playing the lottery will really net a profit, right? Wrong. According to a couple of 2005 surveys put out by the Consumer Federation of America and the Financial Planning Association, 21% of the surveyed Americans believe that winning the lottery represents the most practical way for them to accumulate several hundred thousand dollars. I imagine one would be hard pressed to find a legitimate financial adviser who would suggest that playing the lottery is a sound investment strategy.

Given the time of year with people around me making all sorts of resolutions, the clear parallel between playing the lottery and resolving to lose weight has been on my mind. Joanne and I have written extensively about the chronic failures of weight-centered dietary approaches. Although the exact outcome depends on the specific parameters of the given study in question, research across the board shows that the chances of keeping off lost weight are poor. According to one group of researchers, “Less than 20% of individuals that have attempted to lose weight are able to achieve and maintain a 10% reduction over a year. Over one-third of lost weight tends to return within the first year, and the majority is gained back within three to five years.”

Joanne and I advocate focusing on health rather than weight. In that sense, weight outcomes are only somewhat interesting to us. However, for programs and approaches that revolve around weight, shouldn’t the results at least be better than this?

However, just like people who play the lottery despite the terrible odds of making a profit, we get sucked in by glamorous testimonials, peer pressure, advertisements, and the like, all encouraging us to lose weight. We enter the weight-loss game with the expectation, whether by delusion, misunderstanding, or overconfidence, that we will be the rare exception who comes out on top. “You can’t win if you don’t play,” right?

The difference is that we are not playing a game; we are playing with our health. At best, the weight-loss-weight-regain cycle postpones behavior change that will actually improve our health. More likely, the cycle itself can leave us in a less healthy state, either physiologically, psychologically, or both. Furthermore, just as the lottery can lead to a gambling addiction, weight loss pursuits can lead to serious eating disorders which add a whole new layer of complexity to one’s health problems.

Instead of entering a game that you are likely to lose, leave weight-centered approaches behind and focus on making healthier choices. No, lifestyle change is neither sexy nor rapid. Lifestyle change does not make for good reality television. What it can do though is increase your chances of getting healthy and staying that way.

The Wrong Idea

Posted on by

In addition to the many patients I see for eating disorders, I often have individuals come to see me for help with weight loss. This goal is completely understandable in the current context of our society. Most of us have been told by numerous sources that weight loss is essential for health, and only if we are at the “right” weight will we live long and healthy lives. And up until about five years ago, I would have agreed with this assumption.

But, as I have written about in many other blogs, I’ve had a paradigm shift. There is more and more scientific evidence out there that weight and health are not inextricably linked. In fact, it is completely feasible for someone to weigh considerably more than the BMI and weight charts tell her to and to be perfectly healthy. In contrast, I have seen countless patients in my office who are at their “ideal” weights, yet are using extremely unhealthy measures to stay there and have numerous health issues as a result.

Therefore, I am concerned when the New Year comes around, as I know that our office will become busier than ever with people wanting to lose weight. I’m afraid that prospective patients will have the wrong idea about what I will and will not do. As a registered dietitian, I am knowledgeable about nutrition for health promotion. This means I can provide nutrition education for my patients and help them figure out ways to establish some healthier eating habits.  While these healthier eating habits may lead to some weight loss, weight loss will not be the inherent goal of our work together. If any weight loss occurs, it is just the byproduct of the lifestyle changes one instills. It isn’t the primary goal.

Maybe 2014 will be the year that we can all start taking our eyes off of the scale and instead focusing on making healthy lifestyle changes instead.

Be Your Own Best Friend

Posted on by

It’s the holiday season, a time to spread joy and love to those around you.  Many times this takes place in the form of buying gifts, baking, and cooking for those we care about.  It often involves telling our friends and family how much they mean to us, how loved they are.  This is the time of the year when we show our appreciation and care for others.

So, in the midst of spreading all of this happiness to others, who often gets neglected?  You guessed it – you!  Not only do we often forget or put off taking care of ourselves, many of us are pros at talking especially harshly to ourselves.  Many of my clients have an inner monologue that goes on a continuous loop.  These thoughts include things like, “I can’t believe you missed that workout today – you are so lazy!” or “You have to stop eating like such a pig” or “You are a disgusting, fat person who has no self-control.”

Now, would any of us talk to our best friends the way we talk to ourselves?  Of course not!  Pretty soon, we wouldn’t have any more friends!  Then why do we think it’s okay to talk this way to ourselves?  Whenever a client tells me about her latest bout of self-hate talk, I ask her to think about what she would say to her best friend if the friend was saying these hateful things about herself.  Common answers to the above hate talk include, “You’ve been so tired and run-down lately, it’s probably a good thing you skipped that workout.  You need the rest!” and “You are not a pig!  We all overeat sometimes, and it’s not the end of the world,” and “You are a beautiful, smart, and loving person – self control has nothing to do with how wonderful you are!”

Let’s break the cycle of negative self-talk and start talking to ourselves in a more positive way.  When we are kind and gentle to ourselves, we are more likely to take better care of ourselves, too.  Imagine what a difference that would make!

He Said, She Said: Weight Management

Posted on by

Weight concerns are one of the main opportunities for improvement that bring people to our practice. Our approach may ring true for you or elicit skepticism.  Either way, we invite you to share your reactions and questions on our Facebook page.  Also feel free to contact us directly if you prefer to voice your questions in private.

He Said

“Weight Management.”  According to my business cards, that’s what I do.  Because weight is such a loaded term that quickly brings to mind so many thoughts, feelings, and expectations, coming up with concise language that accurately reflects my approach is a challenge that I am still trying to settle.

Indeed I do help with weight management, but not in the direct fashion that some people might expect.  We know from working with patients, collaborating with our colleagues, and reading the research that weight-centered approaches to losing weight almost always fail.  That’s the irony: The more we emphasize and focus on weight, the harder it tends to be to keep weight off.

This fact is hardly a secret.  In October, I wrote about a conference I attended where presenters showed that over 20 diets resulted in the same pattern of weight change: sharp initial weight loss followed by gradual and steady weight regain.  A few years back, I had a telephone interview with a commercial weight-loss program that was interested in hiring me.  A study they had posted on their own website showed that approximately 85% (I forget the exact number.) of their clients regained their lost weight after one year, so I asked the interviewer what strategies they had developed since that study to help prevent this rebound.  She said they realized that clients are unable to successfully transition off of the commercial meal replacements and must stay on them for life.  This is very similar to the diet drugs on the market, which also must be taken for life or else the weight will come back, as well as commercial weight-loss programs where leaders tell clients they should be prepared to be lifetime members if they want to keep the weight off.  Sounds like a great business strategy.  As you can imagine, I did not get the job, which was fine by me.  Philosophically, we were not a good fit.

It may come as a surprise to learn that the healthcare community is still uncertain to what degree weight in and of itself matters in terms of health.  The folks who officially declared obesity a disease state this past summer can cite research supporting their view.  The “Health at Every Size® supporters, who argue that health and body weight are independent, have supportive research as well.  Personally, I have been talking about the concept of “Health at Every Size” for a decade, long before it even had that label.  As a guy whose BMI labeled me as overweight despite a very low body fat percentage, excellent labs, and solid athletic capabilities, I could see firsthand that weight was not necessarily a good indicator of health.  Lest you think that the unimportance of body weight is a fringe theory or an excuse that overweight individuals use to stay that way, my energy metabolism professor, a lean and athletic guy himself, taught us the same concept back when I was studying nutrition at a large state university.

Clearly, there is still much that we need to understand about how important weight is when it comes to our health, but how much does this question even matter?  On one hand, determining the importance of weight is of course important from a public health standpoint.  In order to best help people be healthy, we need to understand the factors at play as well as their roles.

Speaking pragmatically, however, the importance of weight is largely irrelevant.  We know from epidemiological data that overweight and obesity have become more prevalent, not more scarce, over the years.  Closer to home, even if you have not tried to lose weight and keep it off through various permutations of food restriction and/or overexercise without long-term success, you at least know several people who have.  When Joanne and I listen to our new patients share their histories, tales of weight lost and regained are par for the course.  Society as a whole has been acting under the assumption for decades that weight matters, yet this assumption has not helped us to get any thinner.  In fact, quite the opposite is true.

If we remember that weight-centered approaches almost always fail, the only alternative is lifestyle change.  Even more radical approaches, such as bariatric surgery and lifetime medications, have to be coupled with lifestyle change in order to be effective.  There is just no getting away from it.  Whether weight matters or not, or whether somebody wants to undergo a radical approach or not, the bottom line is that lifestyle change is still necessary in order to improve health.

What constitutes healthy lifestyle change is based more upon one’s baseline than it is on some idealistic vision of what one should be doing in theory.  The efforts and constructs of lifestyle change are usually limited by other factors (e.g. time, finances, personal preferences, etc.) rather than by guidelines, so in a sense guidelines do not even matter all that much when it comes to helping people in real life.  The idea is just to start wherever you are and move towards better health one small step at a time. 

More specifically, instead of gravitating towards a particular mode of exercise because it burns the most calories per unit of time, find ways of being physically active that are fun and agree with your body.  You will be happier and more likely to make the activities long-term habits.  Instead of counting grams and calories, restricting your intake, and cutting out whatever food group is being scapegoated this week, learn to eat mindfully and listen to your body’s hunger/fullness cues.

As a result of these changes, weight loss does oftentimes occur, and when it does, it tends to stay off, but it may or may not be the magnitude that you, your friends, your parents, your partner, a BMI chart, society as a whole, etc. would like.  Therefore, part of establishing a healthy lifestyle means learning to love and accept yourself the way that you are and severing any link you may have between weight and self-worth.

It is really about putting forth your best effort to be healthy while still maintaining balance in your life.  This is what I help people to do; that is what I mean by “Weight Management.”

She Said

Well, we are closing in on the end of 2013. Inevitably, after the ball has dropped and the New Year’s celebration has ended, many people start to think about their New Year’s resolutions.  What’s at the top of the list for most people?  Weight loss.  Every January we become inundated with new patients looking to us for help with their weight goals. Most of them have tried every diet and eating program in the book (losing and regaining many pounds in the process), but they are certain that this time things will be different. This time I will find the perfect diet, most people think to themselves.  This time I will have more willpower, and I will lose the weight for good!

I truly understand why so many people want to lose weight.  Every day we are bombarded by messages about our weight. Whether it is from doctors, the media, family, friends or partners, the message seems to be that it is desirable to be thin and it is bad to be fat.  Those who try to lose weight through dieting are to be admired, while those who are fed up with diets are viewed as weak-willed and lazy.  Fat is not only disliked but also feared.  According to a 2006 study by the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University, nearly 50% of the 4,000 people surveyed said they would rather give up a year of their life than be fat.  The same study found that 15-30% of the respondents would rather become unable to conceive, be depressed or become alcoholic than be obese. 5% would rather lose a limb. 4% would rather be blind.

Given most people’s dislike and, in some cases, fear of fat, it makes sense that weight loss is on the forefront of many of our patients’ minds.  But as much as I understand our patients’ feelings, focusing all of our energy on losing weight and fighting obesity by dieting restrictively and exercising excessively hasn’t helped anyone reach and maintain their goals.  I mean, if these methods really worked, would we still have a billion dollar weight-loss industry?  Of course not.

It is time to take the focus off of weight and put it on health.  As I’ve blogged about many times before, health and weight are not synonymous.  Numerous studies have shown that when talking about health, it is lifestyle behaviors that make the difference, not just weight loss.  When patients come into my office with the sole goal of losing weight, I try to help them shift their view to one that is health-focused rather than weight-focused.  By implementing healthy lifestyle changes such as eating intuitively, being more physically active, and dealing with stress appropriately, one’s weight will often settle into a “healthy weight range.”  This weight range might not be what the media or the BMI chart says is desirable, but it is one that is sustainable and will result in the best health outcomes.

To a large extent, our individual genes determine where our weight will settle.  There really is not much we can do about that.  But what we can do is work on becoming the healthiest person we can be, regardless of what we weigh.  By honoring our body’s hunger and fullness cues, being active in a way that is enjoyable to our body, and accepting and appreciating our body where it is now (not 20 pounds less than now), we will truly reach our health goals.  Now that’s a resolution worth keeping.