He Said, She Said: School vs. Bagged Lunches

Posted on by

When your child started school earlier this month, your family may have considered whether to buy the school lunch or provide food from home. Or did you automatically opt for one without giving much consideration to the other?

He Said

My first job as a dietitian was a research position that entailed traveling the country to collect and process data about the food served in elementary school cafeterias.

In one Chicago suburb, it was considered “uncool” to eat vegetables. Because students were more likely to use vegetables as ammunition for a food fight rather than for consumption, cafeteria supervisors intercepted students coming out of the lunch line and removed the vegetables from their trays before they sat down. I remember looking into a trash can and seeing thousands of peas that were served but never had a chance to be eaten.

In contrast, I visited a Tennessee hill town where they were dealing with the problem of students taking too many vegetables from the self-serve salad bar. I watched cashiers ring up students with one hand and pick off vegetables from their trays with the other hand in order to keep portion sizes in line with system guidelines.

One school I visited here in Massachusetts served soft pretzels as a main course. The school system dietitian explained to me that she wanted to make the lunches in her system healthier, but she was encountering harsh resistance from both parents and principals who cared more about the children eating – period – than they did about providing a healthier option that they feared the kids would reject.

Everywhere I went, I saw students discard or trade away food that their parents had provided from home. Just because you or the cafeteria staff gives your child something to eat does not guarantee that it will make it into his or her mouth, and a school lunch is not inherently more or less healthy than what is brought from home.

As you and your child decide what’s for lunch, consider not just your child’s preferences and health, but also the realities of the cafeteria dynamic. In order to get a glimpse of the latter, think about planning a visit to eat lunch with your child in the cafeteria. I saw parents eating with their children in every single school system that I visited.

She Said

Planning ahead is a great strategy for figuring out school lunch. First, I think it’s a good idea to suss out what your child’s school is serving. Most public and private schools have websites nowadays, so looking up the weekly/monthly cafeteria menu shouldn’t be too difficult. If, however, no website exists, talk to the school and they can give you a hard copy of the menu.

If you and your child look at the menu and nothing looks appealing, the next step would be talking with your child about what he or she would like to bring for lunch. Letting your child help in planning and/or putting together lunch will greatly increase the odds that he or she will eat said lunch! Having your child accompany you to the grocery store to pick out lunch foods would be a smart idea as well.

Finally, a lot of my clients feel stuck around what to bring, feeling like sandwiches are the only option. Not true! One can piece together a totally healthy lunch without needing it to be “standard.” For example, hummus and pita, baby carrots, fruit, and milk can make a delicious piecemeal lunch. Another idea could be crackers and cheese, with cut-up peppers, fruit, and a beverage. Bringing leftovers from last night’s dinner, such as a pasta dish, would also work really well.

The bottom line: If your child can be involved in one or all steps in the school lunch process, success will be sure to follow.

Problems and Privileges

Posted on by

Thank you to everybody who showed up for the Race Wellesley First 5K and 10K this weekend, including runners, supporters, volunteers, and sponsors!  I love events that bring the community together, and as such I was really happy to both be sponsoring and competing in the race.

I finished the 10K race in 10th place overall and in fourth place in my age group.  I missed out on a third-place medal by 0.9 seconds.  The guy who earned the bronze passed me with about a mile to go.  Rather than keep up with him, I elected to stay back.  My plan was to let him think I was out of gas, but then to take him by surprise and out-sprint him at the end.  The strategy almost worked, but I could not quite catch him at the line.  He ran a great race and definitely deserved the medal.

I have never won a placement medal in my life, so when the standings were announced and I realized that I missed out on one by a single second, I was frustrated and could not believe I let the opportunity slip away.  It is easy to look back on a six-mile course and develop a list of second-saving could-haves, would-haves, and should-haves.  I am sure the guy who beat me could say the exact same thing about his own performance, but the reality is that neither one of us gets a do-over.

This is all pretty out of character for me.  People who know me well know that I care much more about race time than I do placement.  The way I see it, time is a better reflection of my progress because I can compare myself to how I have done in similar races.  We are more in control of our own destiny with time, whereas placement heavily depends on elements that are out of our hands.  If the Kenyan national distance-running team shows up or stays home, for example, I am going to finish in a very different place in the standings regardless of how hard I run.

So, if I do not care that much about placement, why did I care in this race?  I am embarrassed to say it is because we were a sponsor.  There I was wearing my green Soolman Nutrition and Wellness LLC racing jersey, our logo printed on all of the racing bibs and centered on the race T-shirts, and our brochures stuffed into the gift bags that each runner received.  I imagined that in the eyes of everybody who was there, my race performance would make or break their opinion of me as a dietitian.

That is probably the silliest and most off-base notion you have read today.  Furthermore, it is not even in line with my opinion regarding how a practitioner’s life influences (or does not influence) patient care.  I temporarily got caught up in a belief system in which I normally do not include myself.

This morning, I went to supervision group.  That’s the term used for when a small group of dietitians gets together to discuss best practices, difficult cases, and other matters of patient care.  It turned into an emotional meeting or sorts, as people in the group shared some of their own personal struggles as well as their fears regarding what their patients might think if they found out about these issues.  Without disclosing details that might make their identities known, I will tell you that one of the dietitians mentioned a personal history of an eating disorder, another shared her struggles with a debilitating and incurable disease, and another disclosed that she will be undergoing radical surgery this winter and has been overeating due to her increased stress.

I only listened.  Had I contributed, I would have told them about my persistent back problems: the herniated disc, the four fractures that will never heal, and other associated issues.  I remember my physical therapist telling me earlier this summer that she does not get too worked up about MRI reports because almost every scan reveals some sort of structural issue, and by and large these issues are harmless.  She told me she only gets concerned when a report contains the word “severe.”  Then she looked at my report, looked back up at me, and gave me a half-smile.  “Severe” appeared in my report three times.

Dietitians are just like everybody else.  Patients often assume that we are perfectly healthy, have perfect relationships with food, and in general lead the healthiest of healthy lifestyles, but the truth is that we have our problems too.  Like a cancer patient who goes on to become an oncologist, why do you think so many of us chose to pursue a career in health and dietetics?

So, taking myself down from the pedestal that some people seem to put me on, but on which I do not belong, is actually a big relief.  I do not have to live up to extraordinary expectations and feel bad about myself when I fall short.  Instead, I can just enjoy what I have, what I can do, what I have accomplished, and what is ahead of me.

It is a privilege that I have been generally fortunate with my health and that the problems I do have are manageable.  It is a privilege that I can go to physical therapy and work towards getting stronger.  It is a privilege that you, your neighbors, and your friends allow me to help you towards your own goals.  It is a privilege that I got to race in a great community event along a beautiful course on a crisp late summer morning with my wife cheering for me.

And yes, it is absolutely a privilege that I was able to finish one second shy of winning a medal.

Did I really post weight loss advice?

Posted on by

Earlier this week, I posted a blog by Joan Salge Blake, a nutrition professor at Boston University, in which she discussed a research study that looked at the impact of calorie distribution on weight loss.  The researchers found that subjects who consumed a large breakfast and small dinner lost more weight than subjects who consumed the same number of calories, but flip flopped their breakfast and dinner intakes.

Those of you familiar with how we work might have been surprised to see me post an article that seemed to give weight loss advice.  Our treatment philosophy is in line with the reality that when people eat well and are physically active, weight tends to take care of itself.  On the other hand, when people make weight loss in and of itself too much of a priority, they are likely to take approaches that can be unsustainable, unhealthy, and sometimes dangerous.  Then they blame themselves and a supposed lack of willpower when the real problem was the approach.  Because I have held this stance for years, my decision to post what looks to be a weight loss advice article probably seems a bit contradictory.

But it really isn’t, and here’s why: Even though the blog does discuss weight loss, I see it as more about health than weight.  Professor Blake wrote, “Since the hormone ghrelin, which increases your appetite, was lower during the day in the breakfast group, these women also experienced higher levels of satiety, or that filling of fullness, throughout the day.  In addition, large breakfast eaters also had significantly lower levels of insulin, glucose, and fat in their blood, which may help lower the risk of diabetes and heart disease.”

In other words, the subject group that consumed the larger breakfast seemed to be healthier than the group that consumed more calories later in the day.  They had better blood markers, felt more satisfied, and were in a better position to make sound food choices later in the day.

And yes, they lost more weight than the other group too, but that only reinforces the point I made earlier: When we make lifestyle choices that make us healthier, weight usually takes care of itself.

He Said, She Said: Sports Drinks vs. Water

Posted on by

The definition of “proper hydration” not only varies from person to person, but also depends on the circumstances. Given the abundance of fluid choices on the market, we certainly understand why people question what is best and how much to have.

He Said

As the duration of our exercise session increases, especially if we are working out in the heat, the more likely we are to benefit from more than just plain water. In addition to replenishing fluid, we need to replace the electrolytes lost in sweat and the carbohydrates we metabolize for energy. Juice usually does not cut it, as the sodium concentration is too low and the abundance of fructose can cause gastrointestinal distress. For many athletes, sports drinks are the answer.

Commercial products, such as Gatorade and PowerAde, are popular options as is coconut water. Most of these offer a balanced blend of sugars, which increases gastrointestinal tolerance and absorption rate. One drawback to coconut water, however, is low sodium content. Many athletes, especially those whose sweat leaves white salt marks on their clothing, may benefit by adding extra salt to their coconut water.

We can typically control what we drink during training and sports where we can keep our beverage of choice on the sidelines, but the same is not always true during endurance events. Fuel belts and fluid backpacks can help, but their weight and bulk can hinder performance. Sometimes we are at the mercy of whatever the race director gives us. In this case, find out in advance (Check the race’s website and/or contact the race director.) what will be provided and practice with it in your training. If you perform well with it, great; if not, use the time to formulate a Plan B. For example, station along the route friends who can hand you your beverage of choice as you pass by.

Remember that perhaps no area of nutrition is more individualized than sports nutrition, so experiment during your training to figure out what has you performing your best. To the fullest extent possible, avoid drinking anything during competition that you have not tolerated during practice.

She Said

Why do we need water? Well, the wet stuff is for more than just quenching your thirst; every system in the human body depends on it (and your body is made up of 60-75% water). You need water to regulate your body temperature, lubricate your joints, flush toxins from your body, protect body organs and tissues, and carry nutrients and oxygen to cells. So, clearly, we need water to live!

I’m sure many of you have heard the advice “drink eight 8-ounce glasses of water each day,” and while that figure is not too off-target, it’s not a hard and fast rule. The Institute of Medicine determined that an adequate fluid intake for women is about 2.2 liters (approximately 9 cups) of total beverages a day; for men, it’s about 3 liters, or 13 cups. To reach these amounts, you can include the water that naturally occurs in many fruits and vegetables, soups, and beverages other than water, as all fluids count toward this daily total.

Of course, the above figures are averages, not exact numbers. Adequate hydration varies from person to person. Some people simply need more fluids, while others need less. To assess hydration status, I often tell my patients to look at their urine, as it can be an excellent indicator of dehydration. If your urine is very light yellow, almost clear, you are adequately hydrated. Dark yellow? Then you most likely need to up your fluids. In the end, pay attention to your body’s thirst cues – your body has more wisdom than you think.

Mountain Goats

Posted on by

Congratulations to everybody who competed in Sunday’s USA Mountain Running Championships and NACAC (North American, Caribbean, Central American) Mountain Running Championships race at Cranmore!  The event attracted the continent’s best mountain runners.  Why the field was even open to the likes of me, I have no idea.

Because we were running on a lap course, I had a chance to see North America’s elite mountain runners up close as they lapped me.  Joseph Gray, on his way to the finish line and about to repeat as North America’s mountain-running champion, passed me as we were going up a steep and uneven section of trail.  His level of exertion appeared to equal that which I display while taking a nap.

As amazing as his performance was, I was even more impressed by my friend Darrin, of the Hartford-based Beat City Milers, who rebounded from a tough start to the season and came out of nowhere to win second place in his age group.  He went from disappointing finishes in May to now possessing a silver medal from USA Track and Field declaring him North America’s runner-up mountain-running champion for his age group.  The award reflects how hard he has worked this spring and summer.

Personally, I had a disappointing race.  My legs were unexpectedly tired during warm-ups and I felt winded after a couple minutes of jogging, both of which were red flags that something was wrong.  In an effort to stay positive, I tried telling myself that I would be okay once the race started.  Nope.  I could not get anything going on the steep uphills, nor on the steep downhills, nor on the flat . . . well, there weren’t really any flat parts, but you get the idea.

Oftentimes, we can forecast a bad performance.  Maybe we did not sleep enough, eat right, or fully recover from a previous race/workout.  Maybe we have been chronically overtraining or undertraining, or doing the wrong kind of training.  Maybe we are returning from a layoff or dealing with an illness or injury.  When one or more of these factors are in play, we can expect a subpar performance.

Other times though, bad days come out of the blue without a clear cause.  It goes both ways though – I have had great runs come out of nowhere when I least expected it too – and either way we have to play the hand we are dealt.  We all have off days sometimes and races do not get postponed because a competitor is having one of them.  The event continues and we just have to give it our best effort, no matter how much or how little that might be.  That’s life, right?

Cranmore was the last race in the USA Track and Field New England Mountain Circuit.  Despite my disappointing performance, I did manage to finish the circuit ranked 21st out of 164 male runners.  In the process, I earned “Mountain Goat” status, meaning that I get direct entry into next year’s Mount Washington road race.

Darrin and Mic, both of the Beat City Milers, and Jonah displaying their Mountain Goat shirts

I got started with mountain racing four years ago after seeing a documentary in which one of the subjects ran the race up Mount Washington.  Joanne and I watched it together.  If I remember correctly, her reaction was “That looks terrible!” while mine was “That looks awesome!”   Six months later, I found myself in that very race for the first time.  If you are similarly curious about trying it, put your name in the lottery and hopefully we will see each other there.

 

Vegetable Cooking Methods

Posted on by

Anybody who has read our What Makes Us Different section knows that I am not crazy about oversimplifications.  Yet, I can understand why they happen.  Some topics are just too complex to be explained in a factoid, meme, or sound bite, so information is rounded off and oversimplified in order to shove it into said formats.  This is most certainly the case when it comes to answering the question, “Which cooking method is best for retaining nutrients in vegetables?”

For example, I look on one site and see an illustration endorsing steaming while vilifying microwaving, while another suggests microwaving.  Who is right?  They are both oversimplifying, which is what leads to the apparent contradiction and confusion.  The true answer depends on the exact question being asked, including such factors as the particular vegetable, cooking conditions, and specific nutrient(s) of interest.

To give yourself a sense of the complexity, take a look at this 2009 article in the Journal of Food ScienceScroll down to pages four and five where you see the tables showing the changes in antioxidant activity in the various vegetables after being cooked in different ways.  Don’t worry about the numbers or what the acronyms and terminologies mean.  Let me just call your attention to a few themes.

  1. Cooking a given vegetable in a particular fashion can help in one way and hurt in another.  Multiple tables, not just one, show antioxidant activity because individual nutrients react differently as they are cooked.  For example, according to the tables, microwaving celery reduces its LOO radical scavenging capacity (again, don’t worry about the acronyms and terminology – that’s not the point) while the same exact cooking method actually boosts its OH radical scavenging capacity.
  2. Anybody who preaches the virtues of always eating raw is overgeneralizing; in some cases, cooking can help you get more nutrition out of your foods.  Look at Table 4 and notice all the dashes and negative numbers.  Those dashes indicate no losses after cooking compared to when the vegetable was raw, and negative numbers indicate that the antioxidant activity was increased, not reduced, by cooking.
  3. No single cooking method is going to be best for all vegetables.  Pick almost any column in Table 2, 3, or 4, and you will see it is comprised of positive numbers, negative numbers, and dashes.  Check out the griddling column in Table 2, for example, and you will see eight positive numbers, six negative numbers, and six dashes.  This indicates that griddling reduced LOO radical scavenging capacity in eight of the vegetables, boosted it in six other vegetables, and left it unchanged in the remaining six.
  4. No single study is going to tell us everything we want to know.  Science is much more complex than that.  Consider that this is just one of many studies that investigated the effects of cooking methods on vegetable nutrients.  It examined this particular group of vegetables for changes in three nutrients according to the specific cooking conditions explained in Table 1.  Do you think it might make a difference if they baked the vegetables at 150oC or 250oC rather than 200oC?  What if they cooked the vegetables for half the time, or twice the time?  What if they fried them with sunflower oil instead of olive oil?  What if they used a different variety of onion?  What if they had chosen to examine other nutrients, such as vitamin C or calcium?

Wow, this is getting confusing, isn’t it?  If you are even still reading this, you are probably one of the few (Hi, Mom!) who kept going after the first paragraph or two.  You can see then how tempting it is to oversimplify.  I almost want to do it myself right now, but instead I will leave you with a question.

How do you like your vegetables?

I am reminded of a conversation I had with a patient a few months ago after he switched to me from another dietitian.  His previous dietitian told him which vegetables he should eat raw, which ones he should cook, how he should cook them, etc.  I know she meant well, and I am sure some patients are looking for those kinds of orders.  As this man said to me though, “She should just be happy I am eating any vegetables at all!”  We need to remember that you are neither a lab animal nor a case study in some nutrition school homework assignment.  You are a free-living person with feelings and other factors that influence your decisions.  It isn’t all about numbers.  We need to remember the context.

Personally, I don’t care that microwaving my celery would boost its OH radical scavenging capacity by approximately 39.3%; the idea of softening a vegetable that I enjoy for its crunch sounds pretty unappealing to me.  Just let me have my ants on a log and I’ll go on my merry way.

He Said, She Said: Ice Cream vs. Frozen Yogurt

Posted on by

Whether we are standing in the frozen foods aisle peering through frosty glass doors or holding up the line at the local ice cream shop, the choice many of us struggle to make is the same: do we opt for the frozen yogurt, or do we go for the ice cream?

He Said

Back about a decade ago, I went through a phase where I was modifying cookie recipes in all sorts of ways in an effort to make them healthier: nuts and dried fruit instead of chocolate chips, oil instead of butter, whole wheat instead of white flour, reduced sugar, etc. These changes sounded good in theory, but who was I kidding; these “cookies” were only cookies by name and bore a stronger resemblance to pancakes.

They never quite hit the spot. Either I ate the healthier cookies by the batch in an effort to quell my cookie craving, or I chased them with traditional baked goods anyway.

What does any of that have to do with the ice cream vs. frozen yogurt debate? Just like with my cookie experience, we want to be careful not to get so caught up in nutrition that we neglect pleasure, for if we do, the irony is that we often end up losing out on both.

Frozen yogurt does have some nutrient benefits compared to ice cream (See “She Said” section below.) However, if frozen yogurt is going to leave you still craving ice cream, and you are going to overeat in an effort to satisfy that desire, then perhaps it is better to just have a small amount of ice cream when the craving sets in, enjoy it, and get on with your day.

She Said

So many of my clients have a love/hate relationship with ice cream. Most of them would admit that they adore real, full-fat ice cream, but they often deny themselves this treat for fear that it will make them fat. Instead, they end up eating at one of the myriad frozen yogurt stores (with new ones popping up seemingly every week) to get their cool, creamy fix.

I don’t have a problem with frozen yogurt per se. It has a lot of things going for it, including being lower in saturated fat and a good source of protein and calcium as well as providing probiotics. But ice cream also has nutrition benefits: it is a good source of calcium, vitamin D, vitamin A, and some of the B vitamins that help with energy release. In addition, given its richness, it takes a smaller amount of ice cream (compared to frozen yogurt) to be satisfying. And let’s face it, when you are really craving ice cream, a fro-yo just doesn’t cut it!

I’m not suggesting that anyone go out there and begin a Ben & Jerry’s binge, but totally denying yourself one of summer’s most quintessential treats will just lead to feelings of deprivation and eventually overeating of less satisfying foods. So go ahead and order that real ice cream – just be sure to savor and enjoy it!

Self-Disclosure

Posted on by

When I get together with other practitioners to discuss best practices and challenges, a topic that frequently arises is self-disclosure.  In other words, to what extent do we share personal information with our patients, and what do we keep to ourselves?  Patients often want to learn about the person treating them, while sharing information can sometimes unexpectedly garner a negative reaction.  It’s a tough call and there is not necessarily a right answer.

Joanne and I have our autobiographies on our website.  Last week, a new patient said to me, “I almost didn’t come today after reading what a great athlete you are,” as she explained her intimidation.  While her “great athlete” categorization was flattering, I disagree that the label fits me, as would the thousands of athletes who have beaten me in races and tennis matches over the years.  I doubt those who watched me finish in 86th place at last weekend’s Loon Mountain Race, or who witnessed my trademarked swing-and-miss overhead during my years as a competitive tennis player, said to themselves, “Now, there’s a great athlete.”

Issues of perspective and comparison aside, the way I look at it – and I have held this opinion for years, even before I became a practitioner myself – the question is not what the practitioner does in his or her own life, but rather whether or not said practitioner can help the patient.  I never asked my neurosurgeon if he had undergone back surgery himself; I just wanted to know that he would perform the operation successfully on me.  Similarly, the patient I mentioned was overemphasizing the relevance of my own athletic background when the real question should have been whether or not I could help her towards her own goals.

Consider the classic example of a doctor who tells his patient not to smoke, then steps outside and has a cigarette himself.  People call him a hypocrite, but does his behavior really have an impact on patient care?  In other words, does the doctor being a smoker suddenly make it more or less healthy for his patients to smoke?  Of course not; they are independent.  All it means is that the doctor is human too and is dealing with his own stuff, just like we all are.

Last month, I went out to dinner with some of my friends to celebrate one of them just having finished her master’s program.  I ordered a root beer, to which one of my friends reacted, “So you don’t practice what you preach.”  I explained that in fact I do, that I encourage people to find balance, the middle ground that is right for each of them, because all-or-nothing dietary approaches fail nearly 100% of the time.  I love soda, I think it tastes great, and I would be sad to never have it.  If I tried to cut it out entirely, I would probably snap back like an elastic band and drink a two-liter bottle.  At the same time, I understand it is not the healthiest beverage for me and drinking it all the time would be detrimental to both my health and goals.  So, I save it for occasions when I feel like it will really hit the spot.

That example really illustrates what I hope people gain from my use of self-disclosure.  I would never tell anybody to exercise or eat specifically the way that I do.  Why would I advise someone else to live his or her life the way that I lead mine when the reality is that we are all unique individuals with our own goals, needs, priorities, and constraints?  What I hope people take away from my self-disclosure is that I am a guy who is working through his personal challenges to maintain balance and achieve his goals, and hopefully my patients find some inspiration in that as they strive to do the same in their own lives.

The Importance of Racing Strategy

Posted on by

Independence Day is a popular occasion for road races.  I love events like this that draw the community together, as runners/walkers of all abilities turn out to participate and others line the courses to cheer on the athletes.  As great as these events are, they are that much more fun and rewarding when we perform our best.

Putting ourselves in the best position for a great race requires more than proper nutrition and hard work.  We need sound strategy, both during training as well as on race day itself.   To illustrate my point, let me share with you the planning that went into my 2011 Mount Washington Road Race performance.

The Mount Washington Road Race involves running up the 7.6-mile auto road from the mountain’s base to the summit.  The mistake I made when I ran the race in previous years was trying to keep my pace per mile consistent throughout the event.   On some courses, such as one that is perfectly flat, this strategy might make sense.  On this particular course though where the grade changes and the air gets thinner father up the mountain, it made little sense for me to act as if every mile was the same.  Going into the 2011 race, I needed a new strategy that incorporated these variables.

My new strategy was to keep my level of exertion consistent as the course conditions changed around me.  Using equations that take into account slope, speed, and altitude, I created a spreadsheet that determined the level of oxygen consumption (VO2) that I needed to maintain throughout the race in order to finish in my goal time.  The spreadsheet showed that I needed to maintain a VO2 of 43.6 mL/kg/minute for the entire event in order to finish in my goal time of 1:37.

MountWashingtonSpreadhseet

The next step was to convert 43.6 mL/kg/minute to METS, another measure of oxygen consumption.  The advantage of working with METS as opposed to VO2 is that METS appear on the digital displays of many treadmills, exercise bikes, and other cardiovascular equipment.  By using these pieces of training equipment at my desired METS level, I learned what it felt like in terms of perceived exertion to sustain that level of oxygen consumption.  I could then run outside at that same exertion level and be reasonably certain that I was running at the necessary VO2/METS level.

As my training continued across various modes, I built my endurance at this level of oxygen consumption until I could sustain it for close to the time I expected it would take me to finish the race.

The spreadsheet was not only helpful during training, but also the race itself, as it showed me what my time for each mile should be in order to finish within my goal time.  I wrote these times on the back of my left hand so I could easily compare them to my watch at each mile marker during the event.
MountWashingtonHand

I finished the 2011 race faster than I had in either of my previous two Mount Washington races.  I was not necessarily any fitter than I was in 2009 or 2010, but I was definitely smarter, and that made all the difference.

No matter the event for which you are training, make sure you have a sound plan in place that will get you to your goal.

He Said, She Said: Organic vs. Conventional

Posted on by

We often field questions from patients regarding which is better, organic or conventional produce, especially this time of year when people are visiting farmers’ markets and pick-your-own farms, growing their own gardens, and generally enjoying the abundance of different fruits and vegetables that are in season.

He Said

Would you rather pay less for your produce now and risk discovering later that conventional food is actually harmful, or pay more now for organic and risk finding out later that conventional would have been totally safe all along?

In other words, whether you choose to buy conventional or organic, you are taking a gamble either way. The decision is personal and based on your own concerns and priorities.

The middle ground between the poles is also a perfectly valid option. For those looking to pick their spots, the Environmental Working Group is a helpful resource. They publish a guide to help shoppers determine which fruits and vegetables they consider most important to buy organic based on pesticide contamination.

When it comes to organic vs. conventional produce, there really is no one right answer for everybody. As long as you are eating fruits and vegetables, you are making the right choice.

She Said

While in general I try to buy mostly organic fruits and vegetables, I am not obsessive about it. Yes, there are good reasons to buy organic (no pesticides, chemicals, hormones or genetically modified organisms (GMOs)), but there are a lot of myths out there about why organic foods are superior to conventional foods.

Although many people believe that organic produce is more nutritious than conventional, numerous studies have shown that there often is no difference in nutrient content between the two. What really seems to matter is how long the produce sits on the shelf, as more nutrients are lost when produce sits out for longer periods of time.

While it is true that organic produce is grown without pesticides or chemicals, it is not necessarily better for the environment than conventional produce, as conventional farming is more productive and efficient than organic farming. According to the Hudson Institute’s Center for Global Food Issues, if we were to switch all conventional farming to organic, we would need to cut down 10 million square miles of forest.

Finally, just because organic produce is chemical free does not mean you don’t have to be careful about washing it. It is still susceptible to bacteria.

So, while I don’t think there is anything wrong with choosing organic more often (It’s good to reduce our exposure to chemicals and pesticides.), it is important to know that organic is not inherently better than conventional.